Clear-sky direct normal irradiance estimation based on adjustable inputs and error correction
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The accurate estimation of direct normal irradiance (DNI) under clear sky conditions plays an important role in the concentrated solar thermal plant. A hybrid model with adjustable inputs is proposed to calculate the clear-sky DNI, including a base clear-sky model and an error-correction model. The base clear-sky model is able to estimate the clear-sky DNI at any place with only the local date and location information, and the error-correction model serves as a supplementary to improve the calculating accuracy with available meteorological data. The error-correction model effectively integrates a linear part and a nonlinear part, and its inputs are adjustable according to the available meteorological observations. Several experiments have been conducted to evaluate the performance of the proposed model with data from three observation stations provided by the National Renewable Energy Laboratory open database. The results show that the hybrid model is able to provide great improvement over the base clear-sky model with 28%–70% on normalized root mean square error, and it also performs better than those using a linear or nonlinear error correction model. It is concluded that the performance of the hybrid model is comparable with other published methods in calculating the clear-sky DNI with concrete statistics.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it