A Narrative Review of Oxygenation During Pediatric Intubation and Airway Procedures
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Hypoxemia is a common complication in the pediatric operating room during endotracheal intubation and airway procedures and is a precursor to serious adverse events. Small children and infants are at greater risk of hypoxemia due to their high metabolic requirements and propensity to alveolar collapse during general anesthesia. To improve the care and safety of this vulnerable population, continued efforts must be directed to mitigate hypoxemia and the risk of subsequent serious adverse events. Apneic oxygenation has been shown to significantly prolong the safe apnea time until desaturation in infants, children, and adults and may reduce the incidence of desaturation during emergency intubation of critically ill patients. Successful apneic oxygenation depends on adequate preoxygenation, patent upper and lower airways, and a source of continuous oxygen delivery. Humidified, high-flow nasal oxygenation systems have been shown to provide excellent conditions for effective apneic oxygenation in adults and children and have the added benefit of providing some carbon dioxide clearance in adults; although, this latter benefit has not been shown in children. Humidified, high-flow nasal oxygenation systems may also be useful during spontaneous ventilation for airway procedures in children by minimizing room air entrainment and maintaining adequate oxygenation allowing for a deeper anesthetic. The use of apneic oxygenation and humidified, high-flow nasal oxygenation systems in the pediatric operating room reduces the incidence of hypoxemia and may be effective in decreasing related complications.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.005 | 0.005 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.008 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".