MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2974278736 · doi:10.1055/s-0039-1697617

The Pathogenesis of Primary Biliary Cholangitis: A Comprehensive Review

2019· review· en· W2974278736 on OpenAlexaff
Ana Lleò, Patrick S.C. Leung, Gideon M. Hirschfield, Eric M. Gershwin

Bibliographic record

VenueSeminars in Liver Disease · 2019
Typereview
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicLiver Diseases and Immunity
Canadian institutionsToronto Liver CentreUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPathogenesisMedicinePrimary (astronomy)Primary sclerosing cholangitisGastroenterologyInternal medicineDisease

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Primary biliary cholangitis (PBC) is a chronic cholestatic liver disease characterized by autoimmune destruction of small to medium size intrahepatic bile ducts. The etiology of PBC remains unknown and pathogenesis features immune-mediated biliary injury, alongside the consequences of chronic cholestasis. PBC is strongly associated with the loss of immune tolerance against mitochondrial antigens and the subsequent presence of an articulated immunologic response that involves both humoral and cellular responses. Both environmental factors and genetic variants increase PBC susceptibility. Biliary epithelial cells have often been considered a passive target of the immune attack in PBC; however, cholangiocyte dedifferentiation, senescence, stress, and deoxyribonucleic acid damage have been recognized to play an active role in the pathogenesis of PBC. This review highlights and discusses the most relevant pathogenetic mechanisms in PBC, focusing on the key factors that lead to the onset of cholestasis and immune activation.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.015

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.057
GPT teacher head0.326
Teacher spread0.270 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations131
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueSeminars in Liver DiseaseSame topicLiver Diseases and ImmunityFrench-language works237,207