MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2974339482 · doi:10.1051/epjconf/201921403058

IceProd - a dataset management system for IceCube: update

2019· article· en· W2974339482 on OpenAlexfundno aff
David Schultz

Bibliographic record

VenueEPJ Web of Conferences · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicAstrophysics and Cosmic Phenomena
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersOffice of Polar ProgramsBundesministerium für Bildung und ForschungMarsden FundJapan Society for the Promotion of ScienceU.S. Department of EnergyUniversity of Wisconsin-MadisonVetenskapsrådetNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaKnut och Alice Wallenbergs StiftelseNational Research Foundation of KoreaFonds Wetenschappelijk OnderzoekHelmholtz Alliance for Astroparticle PhysicsDanmarks GrundforskningsfondNational Science FoundationBelgian Federal Science Policy OfficeDeutsche ForschungsgemeinschaftNational Research FoundationWestern Canada Research GridVlaamse regeringUniversity of OxfordCompute CanadaFonds De La Recherche Scientifique - FNRSPolarforskningssekretariatetSchweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen Forschung
KeywordsPython (programming language)ScalabilityCodebaseComputer scienceNeutrinoTrack (disk drive)Operating systemPhysicsSoftwareParticle physics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

IceCube is a cubic kilometer neutrino detector located at the south pole. IceProd is IceCube’s internal dataset management system, keeping track of where, when, and how jobs run. It schedules jobs from submitted datasets to HTCondor, keeping track of them at every stage of the lifecycle. Many updates have happened in the last years to improve stability and scalability, as well as increase user access. Along the way, the IceProd codebase switched from Python 2 to Python 3.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.008
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.023
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Software · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.048
Threshold uncertainty score0.161

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0080.023
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.002
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0030.005
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0060.010
Open science0.0060.006
Research integrity0.0010.005
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0480.059

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.233
Teacher spread0.221 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreSoftware

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEPJ Web of ConferencesSame topicAstrophysics and Cosmic PhenomenaFrench-language works237,207