MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2974436029 · doi:10.7202/1064591ar

Intervention sociojudiciaire en violence conjugale : état des connaissances

2019· article· fr· W2974436029 on OpenAlexaffvenueabout
Célyne Lalande, Sonia Gauthier, Dominique Damant

Bibliographic record

VenueService social · 2019
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicIntimate Partner and Family Violence
Canadian institutionsUniversité de MontréalUniversité du Québec en Outaouais
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesPoison controlIntervention (counseling)Political sciencePsychologyPhilosophyMedicinePsychiatryMedical emergency

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Dans le présent article, la recension des écrits effectuée dans le cadre d’une recherche au sujet de l’intervention sociojudiciaire en violence conjugale sera présentée. Nous désignons par « intervention sociojudiciaire » l’ensemble des services spécialisés, mécanismes de concertation et systèmes de réponse coordonnée en violence conjugale où des interventions psychosociales et judiciaires sont liées. En vue de mieux connaître ces pratiques, nous tracerons d’abord l’évolution de la réponse sociale à la violence conjugale ailleurs et au Québec. Ensuite, le portrait général de l’intervention sociojudiciaire en matière de violence conjugale sera brossé en portant une attention particulière à son actualisation au Québec. Enfin, les impacts connus de ces interventions seront exposés par le biais d’une synthèse des études les ayant évaluées.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.093
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.132
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Systematic review · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.093
Threshold uncertainty score0.489

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0930.132
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0040.003
Bibliometrics0.0030.003
Science and technology studies0.0020.003
Scholarly communication0.0060.004
Open science0.0030.004
Research integrity0.0030.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0110.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.027
GPT teacher head0.332
Teacher spread0.304 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSystematic review
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2019
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueService socialSame topicIntimate Partner and Family ViolenceFrench-language works237,207