MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2974449006 · doi:10.1002/cepa.1082

Experimental Test of Novel Honeycomb Structural Fuse

2019· article· en· W2974449006 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

Venuece/papers · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicSeismic Performance and Analysis
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHoneycombFlangeMaterials scienceFuse (electrical)Structural engineeringBucklingHoneycomb structureDissipationWeldingDamperDeformation (meteorology)Composite materialEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

ABSTRACT This paper proposes a novel type of metallic damper, named Honeycomb Structural Fuse (HSF), a modified version of the previously developed Welded Wide Flange Fuse (WWFF). Based on the commonly available welded wide flange section, honeycomb‐shape perforations were laser cut on web. The HSF is designed to dissipate earthquake energy through plastic deformation of the web in shear, while the flanges remain elastic. To investigate the seismic behaviour of HSF, a total of 9 specimens with different honeycomb cell wall aspect ratios (cell wall thickness to cell wall centre length) and honeycomb cell combinations (number of cell rows and columns) were manufactured and tested to examine the influence of different parameters on its performance including force‐drift relationship, working mechanism and buckling modes etc., are summarized. The experiment shows that the newly proposed HSF exhibits stable energy dissipation capability, which can be used as an efficient metallic damper for seismic applications.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.176
Threshold uncertainty score0.763

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.206
Teacher spread0.199 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it