MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2974494968 · doi:10.1055/a-0991-7530

Double-balloon endoscopic ultrasound-guided gastroenterostomy: simplifying a complex technique towards widespread use

2019· article· en· W2974494968 on OpenAlexaff
Corey Miller, Yen‐I Chen, Yamile Haito Chavez, Adel Alghamdi, George Zogopoulos, Ali Bessissow

Bibliographic record

VenueEndoscopy · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicEsophageal and GI Pathology
Canadian institutionsMcGill University Health Centre
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineGastroenterostomyBalloonEndoscopic ultrasoundRadiologyLumen (anatomy)Balloon catheterSurgeryGastric outlet obstructionStentCancerInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Endoscopic ultrasound-guided gastroenterostomy (EUS-GE) is a novel technique for the management of gastric outlet obstruction (GOO), which has been shown to be safe and effective [ 1 ] [ 2 ]. To mitigate technical difficulties, a specialized double-balloon catheter was developed in Japan and has been found to be effective when used with an electrocautery-enhanced lumen-apposing metal stent (LAMS) [ 3 ]. Outside of Japan, however, this device is unavailable; therefore, in North America and Europe only highly specialized centers are currently performing EUS-GE using techniques that are challenging and with the potential for severe adverse events. Here we describe the performance of double-balloon EUS-GE using a widely available vascular balloon catheter ([ Video 1 ]). Video 1 Endoscopic ultrasound-guided gastroenterostomy for malignant gastric outlet obstruction facilitated by a double-balloon occlusion device made from a widely available vascular balloon catheter. Quality: mobile 360 480 720 Download A 72-year-old man with unresectable pancreatic cancer presented with recurrent GOO following previous enteral stenting and was found to have stent tumor ingrowth ([ Fig. 1 ]). A multidisciplinary decision was made to attempt EUS-GE facilitated by double-balloon occlusion. A guidewire was endoscopically advanced through the obstructed stent deep into the jejunum. The endoscope was exchanged through an overtube to prevent looping in the stomach. Two vascular balloon catheters with a compliant balloon diameter reaching up to 46 mm when inflated (Coda balloon; Cook Medical, Bloomington, Indiana, USA) were fashioned together with the balloons set 10 cm apart ([ Fig. 2 ]). The device was advanced distal to the obstruction over the wire using fluoroscopic guidance. The balloons were then inflated to anchor the small bowel and saline with contrast was injected through the proximal catheter, filling the bowel lumen between the balloons. On EUS, the bowel segment was visibly dilated and anchored, thereby facilitating stent insertion ([ Fig. 3 ]). An electrocautery-enhanced 15-mm LAMS was then inserted to complete the gastroenterostomy ([ Fig. 4 ]). Fig. 1 Endoscopic view showing enteral stent obstruction caused by pancreatic cancer tumor ingrowth. Fig. 2 A double-balloon occlusion device made by connecting two radiologic vascular balloon catheters with the balloons set 10 cm apart. Fig. 3 Endoscopic ultrasound image of the dilated fluid-filled small-bowel segment between the two occluding balloons. Fig. 4 Fluoroscopic image of the lumen-apposing metal stent anastomosing the stomach to the small bowel distal to the enteral stent. The patient tolerated a stent diet within 24 hours but required endoscopic revision 6 weeks later owing to blockage of the stent by a potassium chloride pill. No further intervention was subsequently required. The use of EUS-GE as a first-line treatment of GOO is limited by technical challenges. The presently described double-balloon EUS-GE greatly facilitated the procedure using a device that is widely available. This may be a first step towards dissemination of this modality and will likely encourage high quality prospective trials to evaluate its role. Endoscopy_UCTN_Code_TTT_1AS_2AG Endoscopy E-Videos https://eref.thieme.de/e-videos Endoscopy E-Videos is a free access online section, reporting on interesting cases and new techniques in gastroenterological endoscopy. All papers include a high quality video and all contributions are freely accessible online. This section has its own submission website at https://mc.manuscriptcentral.com/e-videos

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.008
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.019

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.008
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.002
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.003
Scholarly communication0.0040.006
Open science0.0010.004
Research integrity0.0020.005
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.054
GPT teacher head0.324
Teacher spread0.270 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations8
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEndoscopySame topicEsophageal and GI PathologyFrench-language works237,207