MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Preservação do patrimônio industrial na cidade de São Paulo: o bairro da Mooca

2004· dissertation· pt· W2974531287 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typedissertation
Languagept
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicUrban Development and Societal Issues
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPanoramaQuarter (Canadian coin)Context (archaeology)ArchitectureHistorical heritageIndustrial heritageHumanitiesSubject (documents)Order (exchange)HistoryCultural heritageSociologyArchaeologyArtVisual artsCultural heritage managementLibrary scienceBusinessComputer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The research tums on the preservation of the architectural industrial heritage in the city of So Paulo, by studying the compounds in the quarter of the Mooca, between the end of century XIX and beginning of century XX. In order to show the historical importance of this urban complex, a panorama of the industrial development of this period and its repercussions in the architecture and the urban configuration of the region is traced. Most signifcant industrial sets are identifed and analyzed, in order to stand out its specifics, in that it concems to the organization of the spaces, to the architectural and technical used Solutions, to the insertion in the contemporary urban tissue and to its condition of reference for the local memory. Theoretical aspects on the preservation of the historical heritage in general and the industrial heritage in particular are then seen, inserting then in the context of the contemporary debates and intemational documents on the subject. Despite the difficulties raised by the specifics of this heritage, general possibilities and lines of action are argued to make possible its preservation, pointing ways and new subjects of debates.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Scholarly communication, Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: Qualitative
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.222
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0020.000
Research integrity0.0030.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0070.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.076
GPT teacher head0.333
Teacher spread0.257 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2004
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicUrban Development and Societal IssuesFrench-language works237,207