MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2974538065 · doi:10.1109/tpwrs.2019.2942257

External System Generator Outage Localization Based on Tie-Line Synchrophasor Measurements

2019· article· en· W2974538065 on OpenAlexafffund
Zhen Dai, Joseph Euzebe Tate

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Power Systems · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicPower System Optimization and Stability
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsGenerator (circuit theory)Underdetermined systemElectric power systemComputer scienceSensitivity (control systems)Cluster analysisLine (geometry)Tie lineQR decompositionAlgorithmReal-time computingEngineeringElectronic engineeringPower (physics)Mathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

An identification algorithm is proposed for generator outages in external systems given tie-line flow measurements and pre-outage linear sensitivity factors. The problem is challenging due to limited information available to operators in interconnected systems. To overcome the underdetermined nature of the problem (the number of tie-line measurements is smaller than the number of generators), a clustering method based on pivoted QR decomposition is implemented so that the outage location can be identified to the area of origination. Two test systems, the 68-bus New England system and the 500-bus synthetic system, were used for validation. The results demonstrate that with limited knowledge of the external system, the algorithm is able to identify the correct generator cluster in all cases. Another advantage of the proposed algorithm is its high efficiency, which enables detection within sub-milliseconds. In addition, an estimation of the cluster injection change is also provided by the algorithm.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.990
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.214
Teacher spread0.198 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2019
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Transactions on Power SystemsSame topicPower System Optimization and StabilityFrench-language works237,207