Analysis of Ship Detection Performance with Full-, Compact- and Dual-Polarimetric SAR
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Polarimetric synthetic aperture radar (SAR) is currently drawing more attention due to its advantage in Earth observations, especially in ship detection. In order to establish a reliable feature selection method for marine vessel monitoring purposes, forty features are extracted via polarimetric decomposition in the full-polarimetric (FP), compact-polarimetric (CP), and dual-polarimetric (DP) modes. These features were comprehensively quantified and evaluated using the Euclidean distance and mutual information, and the result indicated that the features in CP SAR are better than those of FP or DP SAR in general. The CP SAR features are thus further studied, and a new feature, named phase factor, in CP SAR mode is presented that can distinguish ships and the sea surface by the constant 0 without complex calculation. Furthermore, the phase factor is independent of the sea surface roughness, and hence it performs stably for ship detection even in high sea states. Experiments demonstrated that the ship detection performance of the phase factor detector is better than that of roundness, delta, HESA and CFAR detectors in low, medium and high sea states.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".