MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2974570919 · doi:10.1090/qam/1553

The derivative nonlinear Schrödinger equation: Global well-posedness and soliton resolution

2019· article· en· W2974570919 on OpenAlexafffund
Robert Jenkins, Jiaqi Liu, Peter Perry, Catherine Sulem

Bibliographic record

VenueQuarterly of Applied Mathematics · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMathematics
TopicAdvanced Mathematical Physics Problems
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaSimons Foundation
KeywordsGravitational singularityIntegrable systemSobolev spaceSolitonNonlinear systemInverse scattering problemNonlinear Schrödinger equationMathematicsSpace (punctuation)Mathematical physicsMathematical analysisDerivative (finance)Inverse problemInitial value problemSchrödinger equationPhysicsQuantum mechanicsComputer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We review recent results on global well-posedness and long-time behavior of smooth solutions to the derivative nonlinear Schrödinger (DNLS) equation. Using the integrable character of DNLS, we show how the inverse scattering tools and the method of Zhou [SIAM J. Math. Anal. 20 (1989), pp. 966–986] for treating spectral singularities lead to global well-posedness for general initial conditions in the weighted Sobolev space H 2 , 2 ( R ) H^{2,2}(\mathbb {R}) . For generic initial data that can support bright solitons but exclude spectral singularities, we prove the soliton resolution conjecture : the solution is asymptotic, at large times, to a sum of localized solitons and a dispersive component, Our results also show that soliton solutions of DNLS are asymptotically stable .

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.024
GPT teacher head0.286
Teacher spread0.262 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations24
Published2019
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueQuarterly of Applied MathematicsSame topicAdvanced Mathematical Physics ProblemsFrench-language works237,207