MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2974577962 · doi:10.32370/ia_2019_09_23

Formation of Artistic Orientations of Senior Pupils in the Context of Modern Methodological Approaches

2019· article· en· W2974577962 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

venuePublished in a venue whose home country is Canada.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueIntellectual Archive · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicEducation and Professional Development
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPerceptionContext (archaeology)The artsValue (mathematics)Visual arts educationPedagogyPsychologyMathematics educationVisual artsSociologyArtComputer scienceHistory

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The article describes the methodological approaches of forming the artistic orientations of senior pupils in secondary school. The importance of the Art education of senior pupils as an opportunity of awareness of the value of human experience is identified. Personal perception of art values is provided by artistic orientations in the world of culture. The essence of the category "value" is given. The author presents methodological approaches of forming the artistic orientations of senior pupils. Methodological landmarks of the Art in secondary school in the context of the universal, national and personal values are defined. Proved that of forming the artistic orientations of senior pupils in art education opens opportunities for the inner development of young people in the way of using arts as a means of the senior pupils' personal development.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: Qualitative
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.133
Threshold uncertainty score0.293

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.265
GPT teacher head0.407
Teacher spread0.142 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it