MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2974585411 · doi:10.1101/772319

Life out of water: Genomic and physiological mechanisms underlying skin phenotypic plasticity

2019· preprint· en· W2974585411 on OpenAlexafffund
Yun‐Wei Dong, Tessa S. Blanchard, Angela Noll, Picasso Vasquez, Juergen Schmitz, Scott P. Kelly, Patricia A. Wright, Andrew Whitehead

Bibliographic record

VenuebioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · 2019
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldNeuroscience
TopicNeurobiology and Insect Physiology Research
Canadian institutionsYork UniversityUniversity of Guelph
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaDeutsche ForschungsgemeinschaftNational Science Foundation
KeywordsBiologyPhenotypic plasticityAdaptation (eye)EcologyVertebrateEvolutionary biologyNeuroscienceGeneticsGene

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract The Devonian radiation of vertebrates from aquatic into terrestrial habitats required behavioral, physiological, and morphological adaptations. Changes to skin structure and function were likely crucial, but adaptations were needed to resolve contrasting demands of maintaining a mechanical and physiological barrier while also facilitating ion and gas transport. Little is known of the mechanisms that underlie skin plasticity and adaptation between water and air. We performed experiments using two isogenic lineages of an amphibious killifish ( Kryptolebias marmoratus from brackish and freshwater habitats) and used transcriptional and morphological data to reveal mechanisms recruited to resolve the dual challenges of skin providing both a barrier and an exchange interface during terrestrial acclimation. Transcriptional regulators of skin morphogenesis were quickly activated upon emersion. Regulation of cell-cell adhesion complexes, coupled with pathways homologous with those that regulate stratum corneum formation, was consistent with barrier function and mechanical reinforcement. Cutaneous respiration was associated with regulation of angiogenesis pathways and with blood vessel architecture that facilitated extremely short diffusion distances and direct delivery to ionocyotes. Evolutionary analyses revealed directional selection operating on proteins involved in barrier and respiratory functions, reinforcing the importance of these mechanisms for enabling the amphibious lifestyle of K. marmoratus . Fish from brackish niches were more resilient to emersion and also differed from freshwater fish in ionoregulatory responses to emersion. We conclude that plasticity of barrier, respiratory, and ionoregulatory functions in skin evolved to support the amphibious lifestyle of K. marmoratus ; similar processes may have facilitated the terrestrial radiation of ancient fishes. Significance statement The transition of vertebrate life from water to land coincided with solving multiple physiological challenges including avoiding drying out while also exchanging gases and ions with the environment. Though changes in the skin were likely important, little is known of the mechanisms that underlie skin flexibility and adaptation between water and air. We performed air exposure experiments with an amphibious killifish; gene expression profiling, microscopy, and evolutionary analysis of proteins revealed cell structures, proteins, and molecular pathways that support skin flexibility and adaptations during air exposure, and ion regulation contributed to differences in killifish abilities to adjust to air. Amphibious killifish are useful models to help us understand changes that enable water to air transitions in contemporary and ancient fishes.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.061
GPT teacher head0.268
Teacher spread0.208 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2019
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuebioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)→Same topicNeurobiology and Insect Physiology Research→French-language works237,207→