MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2974710055 · doi:10.2118/196233-ms

Development and Application of Firebag SAGD Reservoir Simulation Platform

2019· article· en· W2974710055 on OpenAlexaff
Jinze Xu, Jin Wang, Hossein Aghabarati, Amir Zamani, Kathy Lai Cheung

Bibliographic record

VenueSPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicReservoir Engineering and Simulation Methods
Canadian institutionsSuncor Energy (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsWorkflowPetroleum engineeringReservoir simulationSteam-assisted gravity drainageReservoir modelingSteam injectionProcess (computing)Field (mathematics)Reservoir engineeringEngineeringComputer scienceGeologyOil sandsPetroleumDatabaseOperating system

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Suncor's Firebag Project is one of the largest steam-assisted gravity drainage (SAGD) projects in the world. As a powerful tool for decision-making in the field, the Firebag SAGD reservoir simulation platform is based on an in-depth understanding of physics that controls thermal recovery process and meets the need for a practical solution. In this platform, standardized inputs and workflows are developed, and a good agreement with field data is achieved for all Firebag SAGD operating pads with production history. The Firebag SAGD reservoir simulation platform promotes the capacity to address existing Firebag SAGD challenges, capture unique Firebag reservoir features, and support reservoir management and future pad development.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.008
Threshold uncertainty score0.021

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.025
GPT teacher head0.284
Teacher spread0.259 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueSPE Annual Technical Conference and ExhibitionSame topicReservoir Engineering and Simulation MethodsFrench-language works237,207