Tentatives de réinvention d’une géographie sacrée de l’isthme lors de la création du canal de Suez (1855-1870)
Bibliographic record
Abstract
S’appuyant sur les discours des acteurs en présence et leur réception dans une presse française partisane, l’étude montre comment, tout en cherchant à se réapproprier la geste biblique et chrétienne et à l’associer à une entreprise technologique et commerciale, Ferdinand de Lesseps obtient l’assentiment des autorités musulmanes. Il plaide la facilité d’accès à La Mecque pour les pèlerins, s’occupe de restaurer des hauts-lieux, de faire construire des mosquées et de favoriser le culte tout en associant dignitaires musulmans et chrétiens aux bénédictions des travaux et aux fêtes de l’ouverture du canal. Cependant, cette entreprise fait naître une géographie mondialisée de l’isthme, ni conservatoire de l’histoire sainte, ni terre de mission catholique, ni nouvel espace islamique oriental pourtant revendiqué, mais zone de conflits politiques.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.003 | 0.004 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.006 | 0.020 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.005 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.008 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".