MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2974862704

Some effects of pine oil on mountain pine beetle (Col.: Scolytidae) at different population levels

2019· article· en· W2974862704 on OpenAlexaffvenue
L. H. McMullen, L. Safranyik

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of the Entomological Society of British Columbia · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicForest Insect Ecology and Management
Canadian institutionsCanadian Forest Service
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBroodMountain pine beetleBiologyPopulationPinus <genus>HorticultureBotanyForestryAgronomyEcologyGeography
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Two formulations of pine oil (BBR2 and Norpine 65) were tested for effectiveness in preventing attacks by mountain pine beetle and reducing brood production at different population levels on lodgepole pine trees. Pheromone-baited trees sprayed with BBR2 had a lower attack intensity than baited check trees and a lower brood success than either baited check trees or baited trees sprayed with Norpine 65. Only at a low population level was attack intensity reduced by both pine oil treatments. The proportion of attacked trees within 10m of the treated trees was lower in low than in high populations but showed no difference among treatments.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.109
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.205
Teacher spread0.198 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2019
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of the Entomological Society of British ColumbiaSame topicForest Insect Ecology and ManagementFrench-language works237,207