MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2974875806 · doi:10.32370/ia_2019_09_12

Practical Aspects of Appointment of Judicial Expertise in the Field of Intellectual Property (Expertise of Copyright Objects and Related Rights, Articles, Computer Programs and Databases, Implementation of Phonograms, Videos, Programs (Transfer) of Loans Organizations)

2019· article· en· W2974875806 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Andrii Kofanov, Volodymyr Atamanchuk, Nataliia Pavlovska, Maryna Kulyk, Yuliia Tereshchenko

Bibliographic record

VenueIntellectual Archive · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEconomics, Econometrics and Finance
TopicDigital Transformation in Law
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsIntellectual propertyObject (grammar)Field (mathematics)Value (mathematics)Copyright lawProperty (philosophy)LawComputer sciencePolitical scienceLaw and economicsInternet privacySociologyEpistemologyArtificial intelligenceMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The object of examination of objects of copyright and related rights is the actual data belonging to the properties of material and non-material (information) objects. These data are established on the basis of special knowledge in the field of copyright and related rights, strictly in accordance with the requirements of the law and may have probative value in criminal, civil, economic and administrative cases. The features of an expert

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.024
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.107
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.024
Threshold uncertainty score0.127

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0240.107
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0090.014
Scholarly communication0.0100.006
Open science0.0020.004
Research integrity0.0060.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0240.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.026
GPT teacher head0.266
Teacher spread0.240 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIntellectual ArchiveSame topicDigital Transformation in LawFrench-language works237,207