MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2975113448 · doi:10.3138/jammi.2019-0008

Hiding in plain sight: A case of fever, rash, and jaundice

2019· article· en· W2975113448 on OpenAlexaffvenue
Patrick Benoit, Marie-Eve Meehan, Hugo Chapdelaine, Catherine Vincent, Emmanuel Sirdar, Patrice Savard, Bich Nguyen, Me‐Linh Luong

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of the Association of Medical Microbiology and Infectious Disease Canada · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldImmunology and Microbiology
TopicLeptospirosis research and findings
Canadian institutionsUniversité de Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsLeptospirosisJaundiceMedicinePathologyLiver biopsyFever of unknown originDifferential diagnosisSerologyBiopsyEtiologyRashDermatologyGastroenterologyInternal medicineImmunologyAntibody

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A 25-year-old man presented to the emergency department with a 3-day history of fever, anorexia, jaundice, and a generalized skin eruption. His liver function tests showed marked cholestatic and cytolytic abnormalities without liver insufficiency. A liver biopsy was performed, and morphology with routine stains was considered non-specific. Because of the dermatological findings, the non-specific biopsy morphology, and the absence of an identified infectious etiology, a diagnosis of Kawasaki disease was presumed. However, additional colorations on liver biopsy with Warthin-Starry stain revealed multiple thin and coiled microorganisms compatible with spirochetes. His serology for leptospirosis was found to be positive for IgM, supporting the diagnosis of acute leptospirosis with liver involvement. Our case illustrates the diagnostic challenge of leptospirosis and highlights the utility of conventional laboratory tests to confirm the diagnosis. Exceptionally, Warthin-Starry stain allowed the identification of leptospires in liver biopsy and confirmed liver involvement of systemic leptospirosis.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Case report · Consensus signal: Case report
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.006
Threshold uncertainty score0.014

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0030.002
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.002
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0050.002
Scholarly communication0.0020.003
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0060.005
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.003
GPT teacher head0.211
Teacher spread0.208 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designCase report
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2019
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of the Association of Medical Microbiology and Infectious Disease CanadaSame topicLeptospirosis research and findingsFrench-language works237,207