MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2975174977 · doi:10.26698/ao4elt5.0124

Acquisition and Dithering with the TMT IRIS On-Instrument Wavefront Sensor System

2017· article· en· W2975174977 on OpenAlexaff
David Andersen, Jennifer Dunn, James Larkin, S. Wright, Eric M. Chisholm, Jenny Atwood, Edward L. Chapin, Tim Hardy, Roger M. Smith, Gelys Trancho

Bibliographic record

VenueProceedings of the Adaptive Optics for Extremely Large Telescopes 5 · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicAdaptive optics and wavefront sensing
Canadian institutionsHerzberg Institute of Astrophysics
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDitherIRIS (biosensor)Computer scienceWavefront sensorComputer visionWavefrontArtificial intelligenceOpticsPhysicsBiometricsNoise shaping

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

IRIS is a first-light facility instrument for the TMT that operates as a client of the NFIRAOS MCAO system.IRIS is a collaboration between TMT, Caltech, the University of California, NAOJ and NRC Herzberg.IRIS contains three On-Instrument WaveFront Sensors (OIWFS) probes which together with On-Detector Guide Windows (ODGW) on the IRIS imager, pick off light from natural guide stars over a two arcminute diameter field of regard.Here, we present typical use cases for the OIWFS and ODGW including acquisition, dithering, and tracking non-sidereal targets while highlighting design choices that allow these operations to be performed in the minimal amount of time while achieving the required performance.We conclude with some potential changes that will be explored early in the final design phase.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.012
Threshold uncertainty score0.039

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0120.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.226
Teacher spread0.208 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueProceedings of the Adaptive Optics for Extremely Large Telescopes 5Same topicAdaptive optics and wavefront sensingFrench-language works237,207