Reforms in the System of Management of Internal Affairs of the Russian Empire in the First Quarter of the 19th Century: To the Question of the Cause Objective and the Recycling of Foreign Experience
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Introduction. The period of the first quarter of the 19th century became the era of large-scale reforms in the system of internal affairs in the Russian Empire. These reforms were caused by the acute need to adapt the state mechanism of autocratic absolutist Russia to the large-scale territorial and social changes in Europe caused by the 1789−1794 Great French Revolution. In this regard, identifying the causality of these transformations and the reception of foreign experience in internal affairs bodies management of the Russian Empire will help to clarify the specificity of state reforms in Russia and understand the fundamental issues in implementation of administrative reforms. Aims. To identify the causes and conditions that influenced the process of administrative reforms in the system of internal affairs of the Russian Empire in the first quarter of the 19th century. Methods. Historical, historical-comparative, historical-systemic, historicaldiachronic methods. Results. Russian pre-revolutionary, Soviet and contemporary foreign scientific literature, as well as memoirs of contemporaries, on the implementation of a largescale reform of the law-enforcement bodies in the Russian Empire in the first quarter of the 19th century have been reviewed and analysed; conclusions on the importance of the English and French experience in this process have been made. Conclusion. As a result of a comprehensive study of scientific literature and historical sources, the authors concluded that the reforms in the system of internal affairs of the Russian Empire in the first quarter of the 19th century were based not on political and legal ideas of French education, as many believe, but on the experience of the functioning of the British ministries and the Ministry of Police of France during the first empire.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.005 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".