La Ciudad de México, cuna del primer estudio radiológico en la República Mexicana
Bibliographic record
Abstract
En agosto de 1896, el ingeniero Gilberto Crespo y Martínez publicó un artículo en el que presentó dos radiografías realizadas por Roberto Jofre y Fernando Ferrari Pérezen. Correspondieron a las dos primeras radiografías llevadas a cabo en la República Mexicana, dos meses antes de las efectuadas en la ciudad de San Luis Potosí el 24 de octubre y la del doctor Tobías Núñez en el Hospital Juárez, el 19 de octubre de ese mismo año. In August 1896, engineer Gilberto Crespo y Martinez published an article where he presented two radiographies produced by Roberto Jofre and Fernando Ferrari Perez. This corresponded to the two first radiographs carried out in the Mexican Republic, two months earlier than those produced in the city of San Luis Potosi on October 24 and the one by Doctor Tobías Núñez at the Juarez Hospital on October 19 that same year.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".