MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2975308580 · doi:10.7203/celestinesca.42.20218

<i>«Celestina», a Tragic Music Comedy</i> de Brad Bond. Creación y evolución de un musical de Broadway

2018· article· es· W2975308580 on OpenAlexaff
Enrique Fernández

Bibliographic record

VenueCelestinesca · 2018
Typearticle
Languagees
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicShakespeare, Adaptation, and Literary Criticism
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Manitoba
Fundersnot available
KeywordsArtHumanitiesComedyMusicalArt historyLiterature

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Editamos aquí el libreto de la adaptación de La Celestina que, con el título de «Celestina», a Tragic Music Comedy, Brad Bond escribió para luego estrenarla en una sala de Broadway en 1999. Incluimos una breve historia textual de esta obra desde sus inicios, cuando su autor era un estudiante universitario, hasta su estreno en Broadway y la evolución que ha sufrido desde entonces. Aunque esta adaptación musical respeta el argumento y los personajes del original, es más que una mera versión musicada: es una recreación en que la acción ocurre en el mundo moderno, en una ciudad costera de Estados Unidos, y los diálogos están llenos de referencias a personajes y objetos modernos (Sigmund Freud, condones, barbacoas). También, en consonancia con las convenciones del género de los musicales de Broadway, se introdujeron personajes como los «Celestina Boys», un coro de maliciosos súcubos que acompaña a Celestina. Además de poder acceder al texto, el lector puede escuchar alguno de los números musicales al estar el texto conectado con enlaces de internet a sus grabaciones en línea. Se añaden también algunas notas que clarifican las expresiones coloquiales inglesas usadas en los diálogos.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.044
Threshold uncertainty score0.146

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0060.003
Scholarly communication0.0080.004
Open science0.0010.003
Research integrity0.0020.005
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0440.012

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.238
Teacher spread0.216 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCelestinescaSame topicShakespeare, Adaptation, and Literary CriticismFrench-language works237,207