Corporate Governance and Bank Performance: Global Financial Crisis 2008
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This research examine the role of Corporate Governance on bank performance; pre and during global financial crisis 2008.Using 2006 to 2009 data of 27 banks listed in Indonesia Stock Exchange is as research sample.Board, Family and Foreign Ownership as an internal Corporate Governance mechanism and Audit Quality is a proxy for external mechanism.Moderated Regression Analysis is applied.The result shows that there is no role of Corporate Governance in pre-global financial crisis.In addition, this study documented that the role of Corporate Governance practices is poor during global financial crisis 2008, especially 2009.Research limitations: Internal Corporate Governance mechanism does not use board or audit committee characteristics, such as board independent and audit committee financial expertise.Bank should strengthen Corporate Governance system while financial crisis come and uniqueness of Indonesia Corporate Governance system enrich Corporate Governance literature.This research is a significant addition to Corporate Governance literature because of using data from unique business environment and Corporate Governance system as well as in global financial crisis.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".