MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2975371998 · doi:10.1093/mnras/stz2714

The Berkeley sample of Type II supernovae: BVRI light curves and spectroscopy of 55 SNe II

2019· article· en· W2975371998 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Thomas de Jaeger, WeiKang Zheng, Benjamin E. Stahl, A. V. Filippenko, Thomas G. Brink, A. Bigley, Kyle Blanchard, P. K. Blanchard, J. Chester Bradley, S.K. Cargill, Chadwick Casper, S. B. Cenko, Sanyum Channa, B-S Choi, K. I. Clubb, B. E. Cobb, Daniel P. Cohen, Maxime de Kouchkovsky, Michael Ellison, Edward Falcon, Ori D. Fox, Kiera Fuller, M. Ganeshalingam, Carolina Gould, M. L. Graham, Goni Halevi, Kevin T Hayakawa, Julia Hestenes, M P Hyland, B. Jeffers, N. Joubert, M. T. Kandrashoff, Patrick L. Kelly, H. Kim, M. Kim, Sahana Kumar, Erin Leonard, Gary Li, T. Lowe, Philip Lu, M. Mason, Kyle McAllister, Jon C. Mauerhan, M. Modjaz, Jeffrey Molloy, D. A. Perley, Kenia Pina, D. Poznanski, Timothy W. Ross, I. Shivvers, J. M. Silverman, Costas Soler, Samantha Stegman, Stephen R. Taylor, Kevin Tang, Andrew Wilkins, Xiaofeng Wang, Xiang-Gao Wang, Heechan Yuk, Sameen Yunus, Keto Zhang

Bibliographic record

VenueMonthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicGamma-ray bursts and supernovae
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersLos Alamos National LaboratoryMax-Planck-Institut für AstronomieQueen's UniversityPlanetary Science DivisionScience Mission DirectorateNational Natural Science Foundation of ChinaQueen's University BelfastSpace Telescope Science InstituteJohns Hopkins UniversityUC Berkeley College of ChemistryNational Science FoundationUniversity of WashingtonNational Central UniversityGordon and Betty Moore FoundationEötvös Loránd TudományegyetemCalifornia Institute of TechnologySilicon Valley Community FoundationUniversity of CaliforniaSimons FoundationNational Aeronautics and Space AdministrationWashington Research FoundationDurham UniversitySmithsonian Institution
KeywordsPhysicsLight curveSupernovaAstrophysicsEjectaObservatorySpectral linePlateau (mathematics)Absolute magnitudeAstronomyDistance modulusTelescopeLine (geometry)SpectroscopyPhotometry (optics)StarsGeometry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

ABSTRACT In this work, BVRI light curves of 55 Type II supernovae (SNe II) from the Lick Observatory Supernova Search programme obtained with the Katzman Automatic Imaging Telescope and the 1 m Nickel telescope from 2006 to 2018 are presented. Additionally, more than 150 spectra gathered with the 3 m Shane telescope are published. We conduct an analyse of the peak absolute magnitudes, decline rates, and time durations of different phases of the light and colour curves. Typically, our light curves are sampled with a median cadence of 5.5 d for a total of 5093 photometric points. In average, V-band plateau declines with a rate of 1.29 mag (100 d)−1, which is consistent with previously published samples. For each band, the plateau slope correlates with the plateau length and the absolute peak magnitude: SNe II with steeper decline have shorter plateau duration and are brighter. A time-evolution analysis of spectral lines in term of velocities and pseudo-equivalent widths is also presented in this paper. Our spectroscopic sample ranges between 1 and 200 d post-explosion and has a median ejecta expansion velocity at 50 d post-explosion of 6500 km s−1 (H α line) and a standard dispersion of 2000 km s−1. Nebular spectra are in good agreement with theoretical models using a progenitor star having a mass <16M⊙. All the data are available to the community and will help to understand SN II diversity better, and therefore to improve their utility as cosmological distance indicators.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.008
Threshold uncertainty score0.016

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0050.003
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.207
Teacher spread0.201 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations73
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMonthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical SocietySame topicGamma-ray bursts and supernovaeFrench-language works237,207