Amours privées, amours publiques, amours publiées ; l’inscription de divers cercles publics dans quelques avatars des canzonieri pétrarquistes des années 1570–1580
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This article proposes an analysis of the clues given in printed collections by their address to a limited public and by the circulation of individual poems prior to publication. We will analyze, from the point of view of reception by successive audiences, the tension between the paradigm of generic reading of the canzoniere and a published work’s inscription in a specific ethical and social context. Two very different avenues of publication are compared—involving, on the one hand, processes rooted in the context of the royal court (Jamyn and Ronsard), and on the other hand, those arising from a spouse’s mourning (Christofle du Pré and Pierre de Brach). These collections, which readapt the discursive framework of Petrarchism and extend the significance of Petrarchan motifs, permit us to discern the competition between the interpretative expectations tied to the genre of the canzoniere and those tied to addressing an appropriate readership.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.006 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.008 | 0.015 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.006 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.006 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".