MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Prácticas y condiciones institucionales para el desarrollo de la docencia en universidades iberoamericanas

2019· article· es· W2975481206 on OpenAlexaff
Mario Rueda Beltrán, Norberto Fernández Lamarra, Pablo García, Margarita Bakieva, José González Such, Jesús Miguel Jornet Meliá, Carlos Sancho-Álvarez, Alejandro Canales Sánchez, Edith J. Cisneros‐Cohernour, José Alberto Contreras Eljure, José Ladislao López Osorio, María Cristina Parra Sandoval, Alicia Inciarte González, Jesús Alberto Fuenmayor, Ana Julia Bozo de Carmona

Bibliographic record

VenuePUBLICACIONES · 2019
Typearticle
Languagees
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicEducation and Teacher Training
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPolitical scienceHumanitiesPhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Esta investigación se realizó con base en un modelo analítico diseñado para evaluar las condiciones institucionales que inciden en el desarrollo de la docencia en Iberoamérica, los estudios de caso corresponden a seis universidades de: Argentina, España, México y Venezuela. Se identificaron tanto los retos comunes como las necesidades diferenciadas a los que se enfrenta el desarrollo, con calidad, de la docencia universitaria. Se concluyó que el contexto es una variable predominante que impacta el ejercicio de la función docente y que esta es la más importante actividad académica con incidencia en la calidad de la educación superior.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.008
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.018
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.095
Threshold uncertainty score0.188

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0080.018
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.003
Science and technology studies0.0070.005
Scholarly communication0.0060.001
Open science0.0010.005
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.026
GPT teacher head0.349
Teacher spread0.323 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations7
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePUBLICACIONESSame topicEducation and Teacher TrainingFrench-language works237,207