Shortening of airway smooth muscle is modulated by prolonging the time without simulated deep inspirations in ovine tracheal strips
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The shortening of airway smooth muscle (ASM) is greatly affected by time. This is because stimuli affecting ASM shortening, such as bronchoactive molecules or the strain inflicted by breathing maneuvers, not only alter quick biochemical processes regulating contraction but also slower processes that allow ASM to adapt to an ever-changing length. Little attention has been given to the effect of time on ASM shortening. The present study investigates the effect of changing the time interval between simulated deep inspirations (DIs) on ASM shortening and its responsiveness to simulated DIs. Excised tracheal strips from sheep were mounted in organ baths and either activated with methacholine or relaxed with isoproterenol. They were then subjected to simulated DIs by imposing swings in distending stress, emulating a transmural pressure from 5 to 30 cmH2O. The simulated DIs were intercalated by 2, 5, 10, or 30 min. In between simulated DIs, the distending stress was either fixed or oscillating to simulate tidal breathing. The results show that although shortening was increased by prolonging the interval between simulated DIs, the bronchodilator effect of simulated DIs (i.e., the elongation of the strip post- vs. pre-DI) was not affected, and the rate of re-shortening post-simulated DIs was decreased. As the frequency with which DIs are taken increases upon bronchoconstriction, our results may be relevant to typical alterations observed in asthma, such as an increased rate of re-narrowing post-DI. NEW & NOTEWORTHY The frequency with which patients with asthma take deep inspirations (DIs) increases during bronchoconstriction. This in vitro study investigated the effect of changing the time interval between simulated DIs on airway smooth muscle shortening. The results demonstrated that decreasing the interval between simulated DIs not only decreases shortening, which may be protective against excessive airway narrowing, but also increases the rate of re-shortening post-simulated DIs, which may contribute to the increased rate of re-narrowing post-DI observed in asthma.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".