MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

EUDAQ—a data acquisition software framework for common beam telescopes

2020· article· en· W2975802096 on OpenAlexaff
P. Ahlburg, S. Arfaoui, J.-H. Arling, Heiko Augustin, David Barney, M. Benoit, T. Bisanz, E. Corrin, D. Cussans, D. Dannheim, Jan Dreyling-Eschweiler, T. Eichhorn, A. Fiergolski, I. M. Gregor, J. Große-Knetter, D. Haas, Lennart Huth, A. Irles Quiles, H. Jansen, J. Janssen, M. Keil, J. S. Keller, M. Kiehn, H. J. Kim, J. Kroll, K. Krüger, S. Kulis, J. Kvasnička, J. S. Lange, Yi Liu, F. Lütticke, C. Mariñas, P. Martinengo, A. Nürnberg, B. Paschen, H. Perrey, R. Peschke, D. Pitzl, D. Pohl, A. Quadt, T. Quast, F. Reidt, E. Rossi, I. Rubinsky, A. Rummler, H. Schreeck, P. Schütze, B. Schwenker, Simon Spannagel, M. M. Stanitzki, U. Stolzenberg, Taikan Suehara, M. Šuljić, G. Troska, Mónika Varga-Kőfaragó, J. Weingarten, P. Wieduwilt

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Instrumentation · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicParticle Detector Development and Performance
Canadian institutionsCarleton University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsData acquisitionSoftwareReliability (semiconductor)Beam (structure)Computer scienceDetectorTelescopeRange (aeronautics)Resource (disambiguation)Computer hardwareSystems engineeringPhysicsAerospace engineeringOpticsOperating systemTelecommunicationsEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

EUDAQ is a generic data acquisition software developed for use in conjunction with common beam telescopes at charged particle beam lines. Providing high-precision reference tracks for performance studies of new sensors, beam telescopes are essential for the research and development towards future detectors for high-energy physics. As beam time is a highly limited resource, EUDAQ has been designed with reliability and ease-of-use in mind. It enables flexible integration of different independent devices under test via their specific data acquisition systems into a top-level framework. EUDAQ controls all components globally, handles the data flow centrally and synchronises and records the data streams. Over the past decade, EUDAQ has been deployed as part of a wide range of successful test beam campaigns and detector development applications.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.009
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.015
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Software · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.017
Threshold uncertainty score0.056

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0090.015
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.002
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.002
Bibliometrics0.0030.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0040.005
Open science0.0050.005
Research integrity0.0010.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0170.012

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.045
GPT teacher head0.313
Teacher spread0.268 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreSoftware

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations34
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of InstrumentationSame topicParticle Detector Development and PerformanceFrench-language works237,207