MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2975863253 · doi:10.1002/cbic.201900504

Dissecting the Binding Interactions of Teixobactin with the Bacterial Cell‐Wall Precursor Lipid II

2019· article· en· W2975863253 on OpenAlexafffund
Sorina Chiorean, Isaac Antwi, Daniel W. Carney, Ioli Kotsogianni, Andrew M. Giltrap, Francesca M. Alexander, Stephen A. Cochrane, Richard J. Payne, Nathaniel I. Martin, Antoine Henninot, John C. Vederas

Bibliographic record

VenueChemBioChem · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldImmunology and Microbiology
TopicAntimicrobial Peptides and Activities
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
FundersEngineering and Physical Sciences Research CouncilMedical Research CouncilFerring Research InstituteNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaUniversiteit Leiden
KeywordsLipid IILipid APeptideAntimicrobialAntimicrobial peptidesBacteriaBiochemistryGram-negative bacteriaBacterial cell structureAntibioticsChemistryBiologyMicrobiologyEscherichia coliGene

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The prevalence of life-threatening, drug-resistant microbial infections has challenged researchers to consider alternatives to currently available antibiotics. Teixobactin is a recently discovered "resistance-proof" antimicrobial peptide that targets the bacterial cell wall precursor lipid II. In doing so, teixobactin exhibits potent antimicrobial activity against a wide range of Gram-positive organisms. Herein we demonstrate that teixobactin and several structural analogues are capable of binding lipid II from both Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria. Furthermore, we show that when combined with known outer membrane-disrupting peptides, teixobactin is active against Gram-negative organisms.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.028
Threshold uncertainty score0.911

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.204
Teacher spread0.197 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations29
Published2019
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueChemBioChemSame topicAntimicrobial Peptides and ActivitiesFrench-language works237,207