MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2975888061

Evaluating Seed Treatments for the Management of Soybean Cyst Nematode (Heterodera glycines Ichinohe) in Dry Bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.)

2019· dissertation· en· W2975888061 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Trust Tafadzwa Katsande

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Atrium (University of Guelph) · 2019
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicPlant pathogens and resistance mechanisms
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSoybean cyst nematodePhaseolusHeteroderaBiologyNematodeAgronomyDry beanBotanyHorticultureEcology
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Soybean cyst nematode (Heterodera glycines; SCN) infestation is a major cause of yield loss in soybean (Glycine max), and dry bean (Phaseolus vulgaris) is an alternative host. In soybean, genetic resistance and seed treatments are mainly used for SCN management however these options are not available in dry bean. Seven seed treatments were assessed for effects on SCN populations in black (cv. Zorro) and kidney (cv. Dynasty; Red Hawk) bean. Two field studies were conducted in 2018 on naturally infested soils near Highgate and Rodney, Ontario. In addition, two different growth cabinet studies were completed. There was little treatment response in field studies. In the first growth cabinet study, Bacillus amyloliquefaciens and Bacillus firmus reduced cysts in black and kidney bean while fluopyram reduced cysts in Red Hawk only. In second study, fluopyram reduced cysts by 50% and 88% in Dynasty and Red Hawk, respectively while other treatments were inconsistent.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.974
Threshold uncertainty score0.346

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.027
GPT teacher head0.252
Teacher spread0.225 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Atrium (University of Guelph)Same topicPlant pathogens and resistance mechanismsFrench-language works237,207