Self-Efficacy Mediates the Attachment-Pain Association in Couples with Provoked Vestibulodynia: A Prospective Study
Bibliographic record
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: Attachment influences the way individuals anticipate, react, and seek support when faced with chronic pain. Although cross-sectional research indicates that attachment insecurity and pain self-efficacy are associated with pain intensity in chronic pain populations, little is known about their long-term effects on pain, and about the directionality of associations between these constructs. Furthermore, whereas attachment is a relational concept, few studies on genito-pelvic pain have espoused a couples' perspective. AIM: Using a prospective dyadic design, the present study aimed to examine the directionality of the associations among attachment dimensions, pain self-efficacy, and pain intensity in couples coping with provoked vestibulodynia (PVD). A second aim was to test whether pain self-efficacy mediated the attachment-pain association. METHODS: 213 couples coping with PVD completed self-report questionnaires at baseline (T1) and at a 2-year follow-up (T2). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: (1) Experiences in Close Relationships - Revised; (2) Painful Intercourse Self-Efficacy Scale; and (3) 10-point Numerical Rating Scale for pain intensity. RESULTS: Autoregressive cross-lagged models revealed that women's greater attachment anxiety and avoidance at T1 predicted their greater pain intensity at T2. Women's greater attachment anxiety at T1 predicted their poorer pain self-efficacy at T2, and poorer pain self-efficacy in women at T1 predicted their higher pain intensity at T2. A mediation model showed that women's lower pain self-efficacy at T2 fully mediated the association between women's higher attachment anxiety at T1 and their higher pain intensity at T2. Partners' attachment dimensions did not predict their own or women's pain self-efficacy nor pain intensity. CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS: Results suggest that greater attachment anxiety may contribute to women with PVD's lower confidence that they can manage their pain, which leads to long-term persistent pain. This study highlights the importance of assessing attachment and pain self-efficacy in women with genito-pelvic pain and to consider interventions targeting these variables, as they have far-reaching consequences. STRENGTH & LIMITATIONS: The use of longitudinal and dyadic data inform interpersonal processes and the long-term implications of attachment and pain self-efficacy in PVD. The use of self-report measures may introduce a social desirability and recall bias. CONCLUSION: This prospective dyadic study adds to a body of literature on PVD and chronic pain by empirically supporting theoretical models on attachment, pain self-efficacy, and persistent pain, and supports the role of psychosocial factors in the adjustment to PVD. Charbonneau-Lefebvre V, Vaillancourt-Morel M-P, Brassard A, et al. Self-Efficacy Mediates the Attachment-Pain Association in Couples with Provoked Vestibulodynia: A Prospective Study. J Sex Med 2019;16:1803-1813.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.005 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".