Self-Efficacy Mediates the Attachment-Pain Association in Couples with Provoked Vestibulodynia: A Prospective Study
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
INTRODUCTION: Attachment influences the way individuals anticipate, react, and seek support when faced with chronic pain. Although cross-sectional research indicates that attachment insecurity and pain self-efficacy are associated with pain intensity in chronic pain populations, little is known about their long-term effects on pain, and about the directionality of associations between these constructs. Furthermore, whereas attachment is a relational concept, few studies on genito-pelvic pain have espoused a couples' perspective. AIM: Using a prospective dyadic design, the present study aimed to examine the directionality of the associations among attachment dimensions, pain self-efficacy, and pain intensity in couples coping with provoked vestibulodynia (PVD). A second aim was to test whether pain self-efficacy mediated the attachment-pain association. METHODS: 213 couples coping with PVD completed self-report questionnaires at baseline (T1) and at a 2-year follow-up (T2). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: (1) Experiences in Close Relationships - Revised; (2) Painful Intercourse Self-Efficacy Scale; and (3) 10-point Numerical Rating Scale for pain intensity. RESULTS: Autoregressive cross-lagged models revealed that women's greater attachment anxiety and avoidance at T1 predicted their greater pain intensity at T2. Women's greater attachment anxiety at T1 predicted their poorer pain self-efficacy at T2, and poorer pain self-efficacy in women at T1 predicted their higher pain intensity at T2. A mediation model showed that women's lower pain self-efficacy at T2 fully mediated the association between women's higher attachment anxiety at T1 and their higher pain intensity at T2. Partners' attachment dimensions did not predict their own or women's pain self-efficacy nor pain intensity. CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS: Results suggest that greater attachment anxiety may contribute to women with PVD's lower confidence that they can manage their pain, which leads to long-term persistent pain. This study highlights the importance of assessing attachment and pain self-efficacy in women with genito-pelvic pain and to consider interventions targeting these variables, as they have far-reaching consequences. STRENGTH & LIMITATIONS: The use of longitudinal and dyadic data inform interpersonal processes and the long-term implications of attachment and pain self-efficacy in PVD. The use of self-report measures may introduce a social desirability and recall bias. CONCLUSION: This prospective dyadic study adds to a body of literature on PVD and chronic pain by empirically supporting theoretical models on attachment, pain self-efficacy, and persistent pain, and supports the role of psychosocial factors in the adjustment to PVD. Charbonneau-Lefebvre V, Vaillancourt-Morel M-P, Brassard A, et al. Self-Efficacy Mediates the Attachment-Pain Association in Couples with Provoked Vestibulodynia: A Prospective Study. J Sex Med 2019;16:1803-1813.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,002 | 0,005 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,003 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».