MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2976019807 · doi:10.7202/1064596ar

Expériences cliniques de la bisexualité

2019· article· fr· W2976019807 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Jacques André

Bibliographic record

VenueFiligrane Écoutes psychothérapiques · 2019
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldPsychology
TopicPsychoanalysis and Psychopathology Research
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Les représentations sociales de la sexualité et les assignations et possibilités de genre ont été profondément modifiées depuis Freud, et plus intensément encore dans les dernières décennies. Qu’en est-il pourtant de l’expérience clinique du psychanalyste aujourd’hui et quelles conséquences théoriques peut-il en tirer ? Après avoir survolé les conceptions psychanalytiques classiques de la bisexualité psychique et avoir souligné le fait qu’une certaine identification a toujours lieu avant l’advenue et le « choix » du genre, quelques tableaux cliniques permettront de mettre en lumière diverses nuances dans l’expérience du genre, ainsi que la persistance d’angoisses et d’un certain destin du fantasme. L’élément le plus original de l’humaine sexualité demeure peut-être le fantasme, et le sexe le plus sexuel celui que ce fantasme imagine.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.006
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.262
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0060.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.002
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0020.000
Research integrity0.0020.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0190.007

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.400
Teacher spread0.380 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueFiligrane Écoutes psychothérapiquesSame topicPsychoanalysis and Psychopathology ResearchFrench-language works237,207