MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2976029766 · doi:10.29407/nor.v5i2.13061

Keberadaan dan Kompetensi Tenaga Kependidikan di SMA Negeri Sekabupaten Blitar

2018· article· id· W2976029766 on OpenAlexaff
Puguh Santoso

Bibliographic record

VenueNusantara of Research Jurnal Hasil-hasil Penelitian Universitas Nusantara PGRI Kediri · 2018
Typearticle
Languageid
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicSchool Leadership and Teacher Performance
Canadian institutionsWiLAN (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Tujuan dari penelitian ini adalah untuk mengetahui keberadaan dan kompetensi Tenaga Kependidikan di SMA Negeri sekabupaten Blitar. Penelitian ini menggunakan metode evaluasi dengan model discrepancy. Responden penelitian berjumlah 45 orang, terdiri dari 3 Kepala Tenaga Administrasi Sekolah; 18 Tenaga Administrasi Sekolah dan 24 petugas layanan khusus. Pengumpulan data dilakukan dengan menyebarkan angket. Analisis data dilakukan secara deskriptif kuantitatif. Dari penelitian ini diperoleh kesimpulan sebagai berikut: (1) Keberadaan Kepala Tenaga Administrasi Sekolah di SMA Negeri sekabupaten Blitar masih belum memadai (43,86%) namun kualifikasi akademiknya sudah memadai (S.1 dan S.2) serta memiliki sertifikat; (2) Keberadaan Tenaga Administrasi Sekolah di SMA Negeri sekabupaten Blitar belum memadai (39,98%) namun kompetensi sudah memadai (72,22%); (3) Keberadaan petugas layanan khusus di SMA Negeri sekabupaten Blitar sudah memadai walaupun masih berstatus PTT (66,67%) dengan kompetensi yang sudah memadai (60%).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.008
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Open science, Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.211
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0080.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.002
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0030.005
Science and technology studies0.0060.012
Scholarly communication0.0010.004
Open science0.0060.001
Research integrity0.0020.005
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.103
GPT teacher head0.368
Teacher spread0.265 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueNusantara of Research Jurnal Hasil-hasil Penelitian Universitas Nusantara PGRI KediriSame topicSchool Leadership and Teacher PerformanceFrench-language works237,207