MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2976031826 · doi:10.1016/j.softx.2019.100327

AgDataBox API – Integration of data and software in precision agriculture

2019· article· en· W2976031826 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Cláudio Leones Bazzi, Ermínio Pita Jasse, Paulo Sérgio Graziano Magalhães, Gabriela Karoline Michelon, Eduardo Godoy de Souza, Kelyn Schenatto, Ricardo Sobjak

Bibliographic record

VenueSoftwareX · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicSmart Agriculture and AI
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersConselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e TecnológicoCoordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível SuperiorMinistério da Agricultura, Pecuária e AbastecimentoFundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São PauloMinistry of Agriculture - Saskatchewan
KeywordsComputer scienceSoftwareData integrationPrecision agricultureSoftware engineeringProgramming languageOperating systemData miningAgricultureGeography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Precision agriculture (PA) is a set of techniques of agricultural management that, with the use of information and communication technology, considers the spatial and temporal variability in the fields with regard to soil, atmosphere and plants for the best management of the crops, seeking to obtain the best result according to its potential. For a better performance of PA it is necessary to obtain information quickly and safely, therefore computational technologies have been applied to different crops in various countries. Software has been designed to solve specific problems by allowing the integration of computational applications for use in the agricultural environment. Such software makes an important contribution to farmers and researchers, allowing a deep analysis of agricultural data. The present study aims to develop a computational web tool that allows the storage, integration and management of agricultural data through specialized software. Through the Internet and HTTP requests/responses, the tool provides an interface that other software packages can use to send and receive different types of agricultural data (spatial and non-spatial), thus integrating multiple applications. It offers several advantages, specifically reducing application development time and integration. Such applications can be developed in different programming languages and used in different environments. As one example, two types of software (one mobile and another web) were integrated using this computational tool.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.008
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Software · Consensus signal: Software
Teacher disagreement score0.022
Threshold uncertainty score0.072

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.008
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.002
Bibliometrics0.0040.003
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0030.004
Open science0.0030.005
Research integrity0.0010.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0220.021

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.023
GPT teacher head0.237
Teacher spread0.214 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreSoftware

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations28
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueSoftwareXSame topicSmart Agriculture and AIFrench-language works237,207