Bibliographic record
Abstract
Desde hace algun tiempo venimos insistiendo en la utilidad que para el psi quiatra encierra el estudio del folklore del pueblo en cuyo seno desenvuelve sus actividades, y nuestro enfasis en este aspecto de la Psicologia Social es a su vez el resultado de la aceptacion del valor e importancia de los factores culturales en Psiquiatria y en Psicologia. Esto ya se ha senalado per algunos autores y no son pocos los que han orientado sus investigaciones en tal sentido, ofreciendonos brillantes aportaciones que en mucho sabemos estimar, pero a pesar de ello consideramos que no ha llegado a calar con la hondura que deseamos en el seno de la gran masa de psiquiatras: de ahi nuestra insistencia en una serie de Congresos. En Zuricli, 1957, en el II Congreso Mundial de Psiquiatria; en Mexico, 1958, en el V Con-greso Interamericano de Psicologia; en La Habana, 1960, en el II Congreso Nacional de Psiquiatria y ahora en este de Montreal, en 1961, el III Congreso Mundial de Psiquiatria.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.004 | 0.008 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.005 | 0.009 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.008 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.007 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.016 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".