TM Shielding Effectiveness of Slotted Carbon Fiber Reinforced Polymer-Based Cylindrical Shell
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The TM shielding effectiveness (SE) analyses of slotted carbon fiber reinforced polymer (CFRP)-based shells are presented in this letter. The multifilament doublet current method (MFDCM) is deployed to simulate the scattered and penetrated fields in the considered situation. The inner and outer regions of a slotted shell are separated by a hybrid boundary, which contains the material and slot parts. The material part is constituted of multilayered CFRP materials, whereas the slot part is a virtual boundary. A tensorial boundary condition (TBC) is then constructed to stand for the slotted shell with a chain matrix. The MFDCM is subsequently formulated by employing the TBC to estimate the EM performances of interests. Different slot angles of the shell and conductivity of the CFRP material are considered in our numerical calculations. Only transverse magnetic (TM) case is considered herein, yet the transverse electric (TE) situation can be handled straightforwardly with a similar formulation.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".