MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2976308628 · doi:10.2140/gt.2022.26.3123

Linear bounds for constants in Gromov’ssystolic inequality and related results

2022· preprint· en· W2976308628 on OpenAlexaff
Alexander Nabutovsky

Bibliographic record

VenueGeometry & Topology · 2022
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldMathematics
TopicGeometric and Algebraic Topology
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBall (mathematics)CombinatoricsMathematicsContractible spaceInverseGeodesicRiemannian manifoldUpper and lower boundsSimplicial complexRegular polygonMathematical analysisGeometry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Let $M^n$ be a closed Riemannian manifold. Larry Guth proved that there exists $c(n)$ with the following property: if for some $r>0$ the volume of each metric ball of radius $r$ is less than $({r\over c(n)})^n$, then there exists a continuous map from $M^n$ to a $(n-1)$-dimensional simplicial complex such that the inverse image of each point can be covered by a metric ball of radius $r$ in $M^n$. It was previously proven by Gromov that this result implies two by now famous Gromov's inequalities: $Fill Rad(M^n)\leq c(n)vol(M^n)^{1\over n}$ and, if $M^n$ is essential, then also $sys_1(M^n)\leq 6c(n)vol(M^n)^{1\over n}$ with the same constant $c(n)$. Here $sys_1(M^n)$ denotes the length of a shortest non-contractible closed curve in $M^n$. We prove that these results hold with $c(n)=({n!\over 2})^{1\over n}\leq {n\over 2}$. We demonstrate that for essential Riemannian manifolds $sys_1(M^n) \leq n\ vol^{1\over n}(M^n)$. All previously known upper bounds for $c(n)$ were exponential in $n$. Moreover, we present a qualitative improvement: In Guth's theorem the assumption that the volume of every metric ball of radius $r$ is less than $({r\over c(n)})^n$ can be replaced by a weaker assumption that for every point $x\in M^n$ there exists a positive $ρ(x)\leq r$ such that the volume of the metric ball of radius $ρ(x)$ centered at $x$ is less than $({ρ(x)\over c(n)})^n$ (for $c(n)=({n!\over 2})^{1\over n}$). Also, if $X$ is a boundedly compact metric space such that for some $r>0$ and an integer $n\geq 1$ the $n$-dimensional Hausdorff content of each metric ball of radius $r$ in $X$ is less than $({r\over 4n})^n$, then there exists a continuous map from $X$ to a $(n-1)$-dimensional simplicial complex such that the inverse image of each point can be covered by a metric ball of radius $r$.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.018
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.015
Threshold uncertainty score0.051

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.018
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.002
Bibliometrics0.0050.004
Science and technology studies0.0030.006
Scholarly communication0.0040.010
Open science0.0030.006
Research integrity0.0020.009
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0150.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.072
GPT teacher head0.367
Teacher spread0.295 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations14
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueGeometry & TopologySame topicGeometric and Algebraic TopologyFrench-language works237,207