MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2976416243 · doi:10.1109/lra.2019.2944060

Homotopic Approach for Robot Allocation Optimization Coupled With Path Constraints

2019· article· en· W2976416243 on OpenAlex
Weiran Yao, Naiming Qi, Yongbei Liu, Song Xu, Desong Du

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Robotics and Automation Letters · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicRobotic Path Planning Algorithms
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
FundersNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsPath (computing)Task (project management)Computer scienceMathematical optimizationMotion planningRobotProcess (computing)Transformation (genetics)Distributed computingHomotopyArtificial intelligenceMathematicsEngineeringComputer network

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This letter investigates a special task allocation problem with constraints of path planning. The path planning process involved is defined as the follow-up step of task allocation. The allocation problem is coupled with path constraints, which will affect the utility of allocation solution. A homotopic approach featuring two homotopy primitives is proposed to resolve the complexity caused by the coupling between task allocation and path planning. Reference paths generated by the homotopic approach are transformed to desired task bundles for robots via transformation functions. A distributed task allocation architecture with market mechanism is employed to make consensus on task allocation solution in multi-robot. Simulation results validate the performance of the proposed methods comparing with conventional allocation methods.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.210
Threshold uncertainty score0.561

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.212
Teacher spread0.202 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it