선교적 교회 모델인 교회의 새로운 표현들(Fresh Expressions of Church)의 사회학적 함의: 일터교회개척(Entrepreneurial Church Planting)의 질적 연구중심으로
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This study focuses on a qualitative study of Entrepreneurial Church Planting (ECP), a subset of the Fresh Expressions movement, in search of its sociological implications. Although the Fresh Expressions of Church was initiated from the Church of England, recently the movement has been exponentially growing in South Korea as well as the global North, such as the United States, Great Britain, Australia, New Zealand, Canada and other European countries. Two cases (Odukieo Korean restaurant church and Coffee and Church) exemplify this public theological/missional approach that is practicing Missio Dei in the marketplace. In order to find how ECP works in the Korean context, this research employs a grounded theory that is a model of qualitative study to find sociological implications of ECP. Four sociological meanings are discussed in this study, namely social capital, a de-McDonaldization, the third place, and public sociology through the approach of grounded theory.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.004 | 0.007 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".