MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2976644545 · doi:10.1007/s00401-019-02076-y

Correction to: ADAR2 mislocalization and widespread RNA editing aberrations in C9orf72-mediated ALS/FTD

2019· article· en· W2976644545 on OpenAlexaff
Stephen Moore, Eric Alsop, Ileana Lorenzini, Alexander Starr, Benjamin E. Rabichow, Emily Méndez, Jennifer L. Levy, Camelia Burciu, Rebecca Reiman, Jeannie Chew, Véronique Belzil, Dennis W. Dickson, Janice Robertson, Kim A. Staats, Justin K. Ichida, Leonard Petrucelli, Kendall Van Keuren‐Jensen, Rita Sattler

Bibliographic record

VenueActa Neuropathologica · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicViral Infectious Diseases and Gene Expression in Insects
Canadian institutionsOccupational Cancer Research CentreUniversity of Toronto
FundersHarrington Discovery Institute, University HospitalsNational Institute of Neurological Disorders and StrokeTau ConsortiumNational Institutes of HealthBruno and Ilse Frick Foundation for Research on ALSTow FoundationNew York Genome CenterBarrow Neurological InstituteBarrow Neurological FoundationDonald E. and Delia B. Baxter FoundationRobert Packard Center for ALS Research, Johns Hopkins UniversityAssociation for Frontotemporal DegenerationSouthern California Clinical and Translational Science InstituteU.S. Department of Veterans AffairsNew York Stem Cell FoundationAlzheimer's Drug Discovery FoundationMuscular Dystrophy AssociationALS AssociationKeck School of Medicine of USCMayo ClinicTarget ALSJudith and Jean Pape Adams Charitable FoundationU.S. Department of Defense
KeywordsC9orf72RNAAmyotrophic lateral sclerosisNeuroscienceBiologyComputer scienceMedicineGeneticsPathologyGeneTrinucleotide repeat expansion

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex
No abstract in any covered source. Its absence is recorded, not treated as a negative.

No abstract. This is not a gap in this database; OpenAlex has none either. 23.3% of the frame is in this state, and the screen finds HALF as much metaresearch here, so the absence is a measured bias rather than a missing field.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.018
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.057
Threshold uncertainty score0.191

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.018
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.002
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0030.001
Research integrity0.0080.007
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0570.021

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.238
Teacher spread0.231 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractno

Explore more

Same venueActa NeuropathologicaSame topicViral Infectious Diseases and Gene Expression in InsectsFrench-language works237,207