MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Redes de imbróglios: a regulação do streaming no Brasil e suas ambiguidades

2019· article· pt· W2976722122 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueRevista Contracampo · 2019
Typearticle
Languagept
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicCultural, Media, and Literary Studies
Canadian institutionsDiscovery Air (Canada)
FundersCoordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior
KeywordsHumanitiesPolitical sciencePhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

O texto versa sobre a proposta ainda pendente para regular o streaming no Brasil. Como ocorreu com a televisão segmentada, debate-se no on-line a institucionalização de incentivos legais para o audiovisual. Questão importante, foi conduzida de forma insatisfatória, com pouca atenção a problemas fundamentais. Pensando a ação dos Estados através de um diagnóstico sobre o contemporâneo pautado pelas ideias de redes informacionais, espaço de fluxos e tempo atemporal, o artigo converge duas questões. Por um lado, aborda o surgimento da proposta e o que dela se deixou de lado, recuperando a visão introduzida pela Ancine sobre o tema em 2015. Por outro, indica como um acontecimento anexo – a compra da Time Warner pela AT&T – pode introduzir dificuldades no cenário.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Scholarly communication, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.714
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.242
Teacher spread0.225 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it