MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2976740780

Real-time 3D surface-shape measurement using fringe projection and system-geometry constraints

2019· dissertation· en· W2976740780 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Xinran Liu

Bibliographic record

VenueUWSpace (University of Waterloo) · 2019
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicOptical measurement and interference techniques
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaChina Scholarship CouncilUniversity of Waterloo
KeywordsGeometryStructured-light 3D scannerProjection (relational algebra)Surface (topology)Computer scienceComputer visionArtificial intelligenceMathematicsAlgorithm
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Optical three-dimensional (3D) surface-shape measurement has diverse applications in engineering, computer vision and medical science. Fringe projection profilometry (FPP), uses a camera-projector system to permit high-accuracy full-field 3D surface-shape measurement by projecting fringe patterns onto an object surface, capturing images of the deformed patterns, and computing the 3D surface geometry. A wrapped phase map can be computed from the camera images by phase analysis techniques. Phase-unwrapping can solve the phase ambiguity of the wrapped phase map and permit determination of camera-projector correspondences. The object surface geometry can then be reconstructed by stereovision techniques after system calibration. 
\nFor real-time 3D measurement, geometry-constraint based methods may be a preferred technique over other phase-unwrapping methods, since geometry-constraint methods can handle surface discontinuities, which are problematic for spatial phase unwrapping, and they do not require additional patterns, which are needed in temporal phase unwrapping. However, the fringe patterns used in geometry-constraint based methods are usually designed with a low frequency in order to maximize the reliability of correspondence determination. Although using high-frequency fringe patterns have proven to be effective in increasing the measurement accuracy by suppressing the phase error, high-frequency fringe patterns may reduce the reliability and thus are not commonly used.
\nTo address the limitations of current geometry-constraint based methods, a new fringe projection method for surface-shape measurement was developed using modulation of background and amplitude intensities of the fringe patterns to permit identification of the fringe order, and thus unwrap the phase, for high-frequency fringe patterns. Another method was developed with background modulation only, using four high-frequency phase-shifted fringe patterns. The pattern frequency is determined using a new fringe-wavelength geometry-constraint model that allows only two point candidates in the measurement volume. The correct corresponding point is selected with high reliability using a binary pattern computed from the background intensity. Equations of geometry-constraint parameters permit parameter calculation prior to measurement, thus reducing computational cost during measurement. In a further development, a new real-time 3D measurement method was devised using new background-modulated modified Fourier transform profilometry (FTP) fringe patterns and geometry constraints. The new method reduced the number of fringe patterns required for 3D surface reconstruction to two. A short camera-projector baseline allows reliable corresponding-point selection, even with high-frequency fringe patterns, and a new calibration approach reduces error induced by the short baseline. Experiments demonstrated the ability of the methods to perform real-time 3D measurement for a surface with geometric discontinuity, and for spatially isolated objects.
\nAlthough multi-image FPP techniques can achieve higher accuracy than single-image methods, they suffer from motion artifacts when measuring dynamic object surfaces that are either moving or deforming. To reduce the motion-induced measurement error for multi-image FPP techniques, a new method was developed to first estimate the motion-induced phase shift errors by computing the differences between phase maps over a multiple measurement sequence. Then, a phase map with reduced motion-induced error is computed using the estimated phase shift errors. This motion-induced error compensation is computed pixel-wise for non-homogeneous surface motion. Experiments demonstrated the ability of the method to reduce motion-induced error in real-time, for real-time shape measurement of surfaces with high depth variation, and moving and deforming surfaces.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.714
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.031
GPT teacher head0.224
Teacher spread0.193 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueUWSpace (University of Waterloo)Same topicOptical measurement and interference techniquesFrench-language works237,207