Georges Dumézil e la psicologia storica: uno scambio epistolare con Ignace Meyerson
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
A partire dall’esame di tre lettere inviate da Georges Dumézil a Ignace Meyerson, questo articolo si propone di indagare il tentativo dell’indoeuropeista di riconsiderare i fondamenti metodologici alla base della sua teoria trifunzionalista. Aprendosi a un dialogo con differenti approcci intellettuali, come la psicologia storica ma anche il marxismo, Dumézil cerca di superare i limiti teorici imposti da un approccio puramente durkheimiano ai risultati empirici cui erano giunte le sue ricerche. Questa revisione metodologica ebbe un risultato solo in parte positivo. Tutte le trascrizioni di questi documenti inediti sono pubblicate integralmente in appendice.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it