The investigation of the viscous fingering phenomenon of immiscible fluids displacement by the Lattice Boltzmann method
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In this paper, the viscous fingering phenomena of two immiscible fluids with a large viscosity ratio was simulated by the Lattice Boltzmann method. The Rothman–Keller Lattice Boltzmann model was applied to study the viscous fingering phenomena in a microchannel where the high viscosity fluids were displaced by low viscosity fluids. We have investigated the influences of parameters such as viscosity ratio (M), surface wettability, capillary number (Ca), and Reynolds number (Re) on finger structures, breakthrough time (Ts), and areal sweep efficiency (Se). In particular, the effects of surface tension and large viscosity ratio on the phenomenon of fluid accumulation were intensively studied. The simulation results showed that the fluid accumulation became more obvious gradually with the increase of M, which led to more serious displacement effects. Moreover, Se increased as the contact angle increased. Besides, as the viscous fingering phenomenon weakened, the phenomenon of fluid accumulation became more evident. Furthermore, the finger pattern had a tendency to increase as the value of Ca and Re increased, and the phenomenon of fluid accumulation decreased with the decrease of Ts and Se.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".