MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2976885047 · doi:10.25904/1912/1156

Genetic Loci for Paget's Disease of Bone

2003· dissertation· en· W2976885047 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
David A. Good

Bibliographic record

VenueGriffith Research Online (Griffith University, Queensland, Australia) · 2003
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicBone health and treatments
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGeneticsBiologyPaget's disease of boneDiseaseGenealogyMedicinePathologyHistory

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Paget's disease of the bone is a skeletal disorder of unknown cause. This disease is characterised by excessive and abnormal bone remodelling brought about by increased bone resorption followed by disorganised bone formation. Increased bone turnover results in a disorganised mosaic of woven and lamellar bone at affected skeletal sites. This produces bone that is expanded in size, less compact, more vascular, and more susceptible to deformity or fracture than normal bone. Symptoms of Paget's disease may include bone pain, bone deformity, excessive warmth over bone from hypervascularity, secondary arthritis, and a variety of neurologic complications caused in most instances by compression of the neural tissues adjacent to pagetic bone. Genetic factors play a role in the pathogenesis of Paget's disease but the molecular basis remains largely unknown. The identification of the molecular basis of Paget's disease is fundamental for an understanding of the cause of the disease, for identifying subjects at risk at a preclinical stage, and for the development of more effective preventive and therapeutic strategies for the management of the condition. With this in mind, the aim of this project is to identify genetic loci, in a large pedigree, that may harbour genes responsible for Paget's disease of bone. A large Australian family with evidence of Paget's disease was recruited for these studies (Chapter 3). This pedigree has characterised over 250 individuals, with 49 informative individuals affected with Paget's disease of bone, 31 of whom are available for genotypic analysis. The pattern of disease in these individuals is polystotic, with sites of involvement including the spine, pelvis, skull and femur. Although the affected individuals have a severe early-onset form of the disease, the clinical features of the pedigree suggest that the affected family members have Paget's disease and not familial expansile osteolysis (a disease with some similarities to Paget's disease), as our patients have extensive skull and axial skeletal involvement. The disease is inherited as an autosomal dominant trait in the pedigree with high penetrance by the sixth decade. Due to the large size of this family and multiple affected members, this pedigree is a unique resource for the detection of the susceptibility gene in Paget's disease. The first susceptibility loci for Paget's disease of bone have been mapped by other investigators to chromosome 6p21 (PDB1) and 18q21.1-q22 (PDB2) in different pedigrees. Linkage analysis of the Australian pedigree in these studies was performed with markers at PDB1: these data showed significant exclusion of linkage, with LOD scores < - 2 in this region (Chapter 4). Linkage analysis of microsatellite markers from the PDB2 region excluded linkage with this region also, with a 30 cM exclusion region (LOD score < -2.0) centred on D18S42 (Chapter 4). This locus on chromosome 18q21.1-q22 contains a serine protease (serpin) cluster with similarities to chromosome 6p21. Linkage analysis of this region also failed to provide evidence of linkage to this locus (Chapter 4). These data are consistent with genetic heterogeneity of Paget's disease of bone. A gene essential for osteoclast formation encoding receptor activator of nuclear factor-kB (RANK), TNFRSF11A, has been previously mapped to the PDB2 region. Mutations in the TNFRSF11A gene have been identified segregating in pedigrees with Familial Expansile Osteolysis and early onset familial Paget's disease, however, linkage studies and mutation screening have excluded the involvement of RANK in the majority of Paget's disease patients. For the Australian pedigree, mutation screening at the TNFRSF11A locus revealed no mutations segregating with affected individuals with Paget's disease (Chapter 4). Based on these findings, our hypothesis is that a novel susceptibility gene relevant to the pathogenesis of Paget's disease of bone lies elsewhere in the genome in the affected members of this pedigree; this gene should be identifiable using a microsatellite genome-wide scan followed by positional cloning. A genome-wide scan of the Australian pedigree was carried out, followed by fine mapping and multipoint analysis in regions of interest (Chapter 5). The peak 2-point LOD scores from the genome-wide scan were LOD = 2.75 at D7S507 and LOD = 1.76 at D18S70. Two additional regions were also considered for fine mapping: chromosome 19p11-q13.1 with a LOD of 1.58 and chromosome 5q35-qter with a LOD of 1.57. Multipoint and haplotype analysis of markers flanking D7S507 did not support linkage to this region (Chapter 5). Similarly, fine mapping of chromosome 19p11-q13.1 failed to support linkage to this region (Chapter 5). Linkage analysis with additional markers in the region on chromosome 5q35-qter revealed a peak multipoint LOD score of 6.77 (Chapter 5). A distinct haplotype was shown to segregate with all members of the family, except the offspring of III-5 and III-6. Haplotype analysis of markers flanking D18S70 demonstrated a haplotype segregating with Paget's disease in a large sub-pedigree (descendants of III-3 and III-4) (Chapter 5). This sub-pedigree had a significantly lower age at diagnosis than the rest of the pedigree (51.2 + 8.5 vs. 64.2 + 9.7 years, p = 0.0012). Linkage analysis of this sub-pedigree demonstrated a peak two-point LOD score of 4.23 at marker D18S1390 (q = 0.00), and a peak multipoint LOD score of 4.71, at marker D18S70. An implication of these data is that 18q23 harbours a novel modifier gene for reducing the age of onset of Paget's disease of bone. A number of candidate Paget's genes have previously been identified on chromosome 18q23, including the nuclear factor of activated T cells (NFATc1), membrane-associated guanylated kinase (MAGUK) and a zinc finger protein. Candidate gene sequencing of these genes in these studies has failed to identify mutations segregating with affected family members in the sub-pedigree linked to chromosome 18q23 (Chapter 6). More recently, a mutation in the gene encoding the ubiquitin-binding protein sequestosome 1 (SQSTM/p62) has been shown to segregate with affected members of Paget's disease families of French-Canadian origin. In this study, a single base pair deletion (1215delC) was identified as segregating with the majority of affected members in the pedigree (Chapter 6). This deletion introduces a stop codon at amino acid position 392 which potentially results in early termination of the protein and loss of the ubiquitin binding domain. The three affected members of the family that do not share the affected haplotype do not carry a mutation in the coding region of SQSTM/p62. Screening of affected members from 10 further Paget's disease families identified the previously reported P392L mutation in 2 (20%) families. No SQSTM1/p62 coding mutations have been found in the remaining 8 families or in 113 aged matched controls. In conclusion, this project has identified genetic loci and mutations that segregate with individuals affected with Paget's disease. Further investigation of the functional significance of the genetic changes at these loci is expected to lead to a better understanding of the molecular basis of this disease.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.018

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.133
GPT teacher head0.419
Teacher spread0.286 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2003
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueGriffith Research Online (Griffith University, Queensland, Australia)Same topicBone health and treatmentsFrench-language works237,207