A Reanalysis of the Fundamental Parameters and Age of TRAPPIST-1*
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract We present the distance-calibrated spectral energy distribution (SED) of TRAPPIST-1 using a new medium-resolution (R ∼ 6000) near-infrared (NIR) Folded-port InfraRed Echellette (FIRE) spectrum and its Gaia parallax. We report an updated bolometric luminosity (L bol) of −3.216 ± 0.016, along with semiempirical fundamental parameters: effective temperature T eff = 2628 ± 42 K, mass = 90 ± 8 M Jup, radius = 1.16 ± 0.03 R Jup, and log g = 5.21 ± 0.06 dex. Its kinematics point toward an older age, while spectral indices indicate youth; therefore, we compare the overall SED and NIR bands of TRAPPIST-1 to field-age, low-gravity, and low-metallicity dwarfs of similar T eff and L bol. We find field dwarfs of similar T eff and L bol best fit the overall and band-by-band features of TRAPPIST-1. Additionally, we present new Allers & Liu spectral indices for the SpeX SXD and FIRE spectra of TRAPPIST-1, both classifying it as intermediate gravity. Examining T eff, L bol, and absolute JHKW1W2 magnitudes versus optical spectral type places TRAPPIST-1 in an ambiguous location containing both field and intermediate-gravity sources. Kinematics place TRAPPIST-1 within a subpopulation of intermediate-gravity sources lacking bona fide membership in a moving group with higher tangential and UVW velocities. We conclude that TRAPPIST-1 is a field-age source with subtle spectral features reminiscent of a low surface gravity object. To resolve the cause of TRAPPIST-1's intermediate-gravity indicators we speculate on two avenues that might be correlated to inflate the radius: (1) magnetic activity or (2) tidal interactions from planets. We find the M8 dwarf LHS 132 is an excellent match to TRAPPIST-1's spectral peculiarities along with the M9 β dwarf 2MASS J10220489+0200477, the L1 β 2MASS J10224821+5825453, and the L0 β 2MASS J23224684−3133231, which have distinct kinematics, making all four intriguing targets for future exoplanet studies.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".