MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2976921876 · doi:10.1109/sest.2019.8849063

Flywheel-based Micro Energy Grid for Reliable Emergency Back-up Power for Nuclear Power Plant

2019· article· en· W2976921876 on OpenAlexaff
Muhammad R. Abdussami, Hossam A. Gabbar

Bibliographic record

Venue2019 International Conference on Smart Energy Systems and Technologies (SEST) · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced Battery Technologies Research
Canadian institutionsOntario Tech University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsFlywheelNuclear power plantPower (physics)Electrical engineeringPower gridEnergy (signal processing)Computer scienceNuclear engineeringReliability engineeringAutomotive engineeringEngineeringPhysicsNuclear physics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The Emergency Power Supply (EPS) is an inevitable part for the reliability of a Nuclear Power Plant (NPP). In case of failure of the power supply to electrical equipment in the NPP, the backup EPS plays a vital role. This paper proposes an innovative approach, with Flywheel-based Fast Charging Station (FFCS) along with Micro Energy Grid (MEG), to confirm the continuous power supply to the electrical system during the emergency in NPP. The paper focuses on the emergency diesel generator and battery system, which are connected to the Class III and Class I power of the NPP respectively for emergency purpose. The proposed model will eliminate the drawbacks of the battery system and the diesel generator. The MEG can operate in both mode; grid-connected mode (normal mode) and islanded mode (emergency mode). In normal mode, the electricity will be generated, stored in the main grid via an energy storage system or supplied to the consumer end. Under the emergency condition, the MEG will be disconnected from the main grid and will be connected to the FFCS depending on the requirements. The simulation results intend to show the novelty of the proposed model.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.013

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.245
Teacher spread0.227 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venue2019 International Conference on Smart Energy Systems and Technologies (SEST)Same topicAdvanced Battery Technologies ResearchFrench-language works237,207