PENENTUAN STATUS MUTU DAN STRATEGI PENGENDALIAN PENCEMARAN AIR SUNGAI SEBAGAI UPAYA PENGELOLAAN KUALITAS LINGKUNGAN(Studi Kasus: Sungai Rambut, Kabupaten Pemalang-Tegal, Jawa Tengah)
Bibliographic record
Abstract
ABSTRAK Penentuan Status Mutu dan Strategi Pengendalian Pencemaran Air Sungai Sebagai Upaya Pengelolaan Kualitas Lingkungan (Studi Kasus: Sungai Rambut, Kabupaten Pemalang-Tegal, Jawa Tengah) Aaf Efiana, Dwi Siwi Handayani, Winardi Dwi Nugraha Sungai Rambut merupakan bagaian dari DAS Rambut yang terletak di perbatasan antara Kabupaten Pemalang dan Kabupaten Tegal, Provinsi Jawa Tengah. Hulu sungai utama berada di Desa Kajenengan, Kecamata Bojong dan hilir berada di Desa Kedungkelor Kecamatan Warureja. Berdasarkan tata guna lahan, di sepanjang sungai Rambut didominasi oleh lahan pertanian, perkebunan dan pemukiman. Adanya aktifitas di sekitar Sungai Rambut dapat menurunkan kualitas air karena masuknya air limbah seperti limbah domestik dan limbah pertanian ke sungai. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menentukan status mutu air sungai dengan menggunakan metode NSF WQI (Nation Sanitation Foundation Water Quality Index) dan CCME WQI (Canadian Council of Ministers of The Environment Water Quality Index). Parameter yang diukur yaitu Temperatur, Kekeruhan, Total Solid, pH, Phospat, DO, BOD, Nitrat, dan Fecal Coliform. Hasil perhitungan status mutu air dengan metode NSF WQI adalah Sungai Rambut masuk dalam kategori “Sedang-Baik” dengan kisaran nilai 63,83-74,15, sedangkan hasil perhitungan metode CCME WQI, status mutu Sungai Rambut adalah “Buruk-Sangat Baik” dengan kisaran nilai 53,54-100. Pengendalian pencemaran air Sungai Rambut dilakukan dengan berdasarkan analisis kualitas air, hasil status mutu air, tata guna lahan, studi literatur. Kata kunci: kualitas air, Sungai Rambut, NSF WQI, CCME WQI
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.004 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.004 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.004 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.006 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.003 | 0.005 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.008 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".