MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2977057404 · doi:10.1109/infcomw.2019.8845149

Point Estimator Log Tracker for Cloud Monitoring

2019· article· en· W2977057404 on OpenAlexaff
Tariq Daradkeh, Anjali Agarwal, Nishith Goel, Adam Kozłowski

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicCloud Computing and Resource Management
Canadian institutionsCistel Technology (Canada)Concordia University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCloud computingComputer scienceWorkloadReal-time computingControl reconfigurationCloud managementDistributed computingOperating systemEmbedded system

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A cloud management system depends mainly on monitoring systems to perform the right management actions, especially in a high change configuration parameters environment. Monitoring system must provide needed information to cloud manager to describe cloud dynamic state by reading cloud-generated logs and sending them to cloud manager. Log updates should be accurate, instantaneous and sent with minimum time delay. Data sources vary from low to high level of cloud infrastructure resources, or it can be generated from workload demands. Logs are used to discover cloud system status, which is input for future actions in cloud management resources orchestration. A good monitoring system must reduce number of communication transactions with cloud manager and keep a fresh and consistent log update. This work introduces a new method of logs tracking and sampling that can achieve lower logging transactions and cloud system reconfiguration actions, under several types of workload and log data sources. The proposed method, Point Estimator (PE) log tracker, can dynamically adapt to the type of workload providing accurate fresh logs values to cloud manager with minimum number of data transactions.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.897
Threshold uncertainty score0.353

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.250
Teacher spread0.234 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicCloud Computing and Resource ManagementFrench-language works237,207